Friday, January 24, 2020

Black Women clubs of denver Essay -- essays research papers

In this study you asked us to look more closely at the plight of African American women of the west and their impact on the community in which they lived. I found that most of the articles assigned were of little help in achieving this objective, in that a large amount of the articles did not give much mention of the effects of these women on their communities. However, I was able to find little bits of helpful information in each article and with the help of the article â€Å"Lifting as We Climb† (which held the most valuable information), I was able to formulate the following analyze.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  African American women that are focused on in the article â€Å"Lifting as We Climb†, I believe, give a fairly accurate overview of the over all impact and ideal system that many blacks in the community held. Therefore, to understand African American women’s ideal, which invariably is a reflection of the overall black ideal system, we must first evaluate the overall stance of blacks across the nation. The increasingly large amount of racism that was being experienced by blacks across the country during the reconstruction era and later, forced the African American’s of this nation to unite under one common belief. Originally the belief was that, with the 13th and 14th amendments, blacks would soon be experience full participation in the main stream culture of white Americans. This, they would soon realize, would not be the case and so a new approach must be taken. African A...

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas Essay

Philosophers live and encourage others to live according to the rules of practical wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human life, Kant observed duty and obligation from respect for the law, and Levinas examined one’s responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view offer different answers regarding the search for the good. In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound together by similar ideas. For example, each of the philosophers believed in optimism– they thought that all humans are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers believed in using reason to be ethical. They emphasized the concept of living well and acting well by using virtuous habits and good character to reach the â€Å"good†. Furthermore, they all believed in self actualization– in other words, ethically being the best one can be. They all thought an ethical person must be rational and responsible for their actions. They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society. Aristotle lived during the B. C. era and established the concept of teleological ethics. This means that ethics has a purpose or a reason. He stressed the concept of doctrine of the mean– maintaining balance in one’s actions. Additionally, he theorized the idea of developing virtuous habits to build good character as well as that happiness is the main goal of all human beings. He explained how reaching one’s potential by living well and acting well will ultimately lead to happiness. Moreover, he stated one should base one’s actions on reason and he introduced the concept that reason controls desire. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who lived the majority his life in the 1700’s. He believed that an individual should use God, freedom, and immortality to be able to pursue and attain the supreme good. He also believed in deontological ethics, meaning it is one’s obligation and duty to do what is right. Kant said that an individual must use intellect, free will, and reason to carry out this duty. He is similar to Aristotle because likewise, he believed that it is ideal for all people to act in an ethical manner by using reason. However, unlike Aristotle, Kant believed one must act ethically as an individual autonomy for the good of society. He said that one must use reason and free will to carry out one’s duty and moral obligation to do good. He stressed the concept of not expecting to gain anything in return while performing ethical tasks– even though one might not like it– one should act ethically out of the goodness in one’s heart. On the other hand, Aristotle believed one should act ethically as part of a community– based on politics. He also expected a benefit in return, contrary to Kant. Aristotle said that it is ideal to achieve a reasonable means in ethics, and he expected to gain something– like happiness for instance– in return. Also, contrary to Aristotle’s theory, Kant’s theory proposes that it is not very possible to achieve the supreme good in one’s lifetime. He suggested that humans must achieve this good in a life after death. This proves that their theories regarding how to achieve the supreme good differ considerably. Emmanuel Levinas was a Jewish philosopher of the 20th century. He observed that the West focused on the Unity of Beings, not the Hebrew infinity. The Hebrew Infinity focuses on uniqueness and singularity of things which gives them identity. Levinas based his ethics on this concept. Levinas believed one encounters the good or God in all individuals or in creation. He said one needs to recognize these traces, accept them, and respond to them. He talked about the thrill of astonishment, which is a face to face experience that touches one deeply. Additionally, he suggested that the face of the stranger (the Other) demands that you recognize it and provide it hospitality. Thus, the face becomes ethical. He had this whole idea of promoting freedom rather than limiting it. He believed that the face is a â€Å"trace of God† that refuses to use power. Instead, the face calls one to be responsible by humbly beckoning those that passes by. Kant also had similar theories as Levinas because both of them emphasized that God is necessary for a person to act ethically. In other words, they included God in their search for the good. Kant believed one cannot do this without God, whereas Levinas believed humans are motivated by God to do good. With the concept of the Other, Levinas suggested that humans have a responsibility to respond with caring and compassion. Similarly, Kant also believed in caring and compassion because he believed in the Universal Law– if it is an act that is good for everyone, then it is good for an individual. It is evident that Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches that aided them in their search for the good. Despite the fact that they have several similar theories, each philosopher has many unique theories that will continue to help future generations learn to live ethically and to ultimately achieve the greater good.

Tuesday, January 7, 2020

Debate On Legalization Of Marijuana - 1384 Words

Argumentative Speech Yakob Kassa Topic: Legalization of marijuana General Purpose: To argue Specific Purpose: To argue that all states in the Unites States of America should legalize marijuana. Thesis Statement: Marijuana should be legalized in all states because, (1) it benefits the health of citizens; (2) it benefits states financially; and (3) it will decrease the health risk of citizens. Introduction I. Marijuana prohibition applies to everyone that lives in the United States regardless of age, gender and race including the sick as well the dying. II. According to the U.S. drug enforcement administration, under Title 21 of the United States Code (USC) Controlled Substances Act, Section 812, marijuana is â€Å"classified as a Schedule One substance which has no medicinal value.† A. Even though this law still applies to all federal agencies, a number of states have legalized marijuana for recreational and medicinal use. B. States of the U.S. are spilt in two different paths. 1. Some states feel that marijuana has no medical value and that it will increase the health risk of citizens. 2. Other states feel that marijuana plant contains several chemicals that may prove useful for treating a range of illnesses or symptoms. ( NIDA ) C. I side with the other states that support the legalization of marijuana not just because of the medical value but also because of the financial benefits that the states will gain. III. I have hilled my migraine by smoking herbs whenShow MoreRelatedThe Debate Legalization Of Marijuana Legalization Essay1789 Words   |  8 Pages Running head: The Great Debate 2016: Marijuana Legalization 1 THE GREAT DEBATE 2016: MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION 9 The Great Debate 2016: Marijuana Legalization Francie DeSalvio Middlesex Community College Introduction On November 8th 2016 this country will elect its 45th President. There will also be a record number of marijuana initiatives on November ballots across the country. Medical Marijuana questions will be offered to voters in four states; Arkansas, Florida, MontanaRead MoreThe Legalization of Marijuana Debate564 Words   |  2 Pageswith the name of Marijuana. Marijuana legalization is a controversial issue that is going on all around the world. The current debate is â€Å"Should Marijuana Use Be Legalized.† With the media constantly discussing the debate of why marijuana should be legalized, it’s not surprising that people have already chosen their respected side. There are many reasons why marijuana should be legalized. First, medical marijuana is used on patients with life threatening illness. Medical marijuana relieves their painRead MoreThe Debate Over Legalization Of Marijuana1732 Words   |  7 PagesThe Proposed Debate for the Legalization of Marijuana Jonathan Acree Online Research Methods Middle Georgia State University Fall 2016 Abstract The purpose of this content is to strategically examine the overwhelming plethora of information surrounding the legalization of marijuana. Many sources available have been used to identify the mental, physical, economic and social issues surrounding the facets of marijuana use on both ends of the spectrum. While the judicial system is holding to theRead MoreThe Debate Over The Legalization Of Marijuana952 Words   |  4 Pagesaddress my concern over the legalization of marijuana. The debate over the issue of marijuana and its legalization has been an immensely prevalent one in the nation over several years now. The issue of legalizing marijuana is truly a controversial one, and certainly one that requires a plethora of considerations at the top levels of the legislative branch. Legalizing marijuana would not only make it easily accessible to patients for treatment in states in which medicinal marijuana is currently not legalRead MoreContinuous Debates about the Legalization of M arijuana Essay1214 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Legalization of marijuana is a notorious topic in the world today, and like any other contentious subject, it has number of support, and opposition. The valid points for both sides are plentiful, and each side feels very strong about their position on the topic. Marijuana is a psychoactive drug used for medicinal purposes, and as an illicit drug (Earleywine 34). Marijuana is the most commonly used drug in the world today. Marijuana has a psychoactive effect, and this has made it recognizedRead MoreThe Debate Over The Legalization of Marijuana Essay examples1363 Words   |  6 Pagesare affected by public actions and decisions. In the United States, there are governmental actions that decided just how much intervention will be used on a business. This is a redundant topic, as the two political parties, Republican and Democrat, debate the issue frequently. The idea of â€Å"laissez-faire† is a free market economy where businesses have the right to do whatever they want. Republ icans tend to lean towards this ideal, while Democrats call for more governmental intervention on businessesRead MoreEssay about The Debate over the Legalization of Marijuana2786 Words   |  12 PagesThe debate over whether or not marijuana should be legalized has been active throughout the United States for nearly a century with arguments from both sides, pro and con, posing quite valid points. Research has proven that cannabis, in various forms, has been used for hundreds of years for recreational, medicinal and industrial purposes. Contrary to common misconception, cannabis, or marijuana, is not smoked in all forms. Only the flowers, or buds, and leaves are harvested for recreational use.Read MoreEssay about Should We Legalize Marijuana in Canada?1081 Words   |  5 PagesTo Legalize or to Not Legalize: The Debate Behind Marijuana in Canada The legalization of marijuana is an issue that consistently discussed and debated, not only in North America, but throughout the entire world. Despite being illegal in every country, marijuana remains the most widely used illicit drug in the world. The popularity of this drug is the cause for the continuous legalization debate, resulting in various legislations pertaining to the consumption of the substance. Every country hasRead MoreMedical Marijuana Laws and their Effects1556 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ Medical Marijuana Laws and their Effects Keith Reese COM/156 7/23/2014 Jennifer Preus Medical Marijuana Laws and their Effects In 1936, George Herliman produced the propaganda film â€Å"Tell Your Children†, later titled â€Å"Reefer Madness†(â€Å"IMBD†, 1990-2014). This film, financed by a church group to display the exaggerated consequences of marijuana usage, was intended to inspire fear in parents and children alike. Though marijuana legalization has become a front burner topicRead MoreA Call for the Continued Prohibition of Marijuana and Other Drugs1239 Words   |  5 PagesA Call for the Continued Prohibition of Marijuana and Other Drugs Alcohol, if consumed in high quantities, poses serious personal and public health and safety issues. In the realm of public safety, engaging in said activity significantly impairs cognitive activity, affecting one’s ability to utilize proper judgment and operate machinery, among other things. Thus, operating machinery while under the influence of alcohol puts not only the operator, but also others in the vicinity of the operator,